Archive for forum.sports-pro.co.uk A discussion forum devoted to people who want to talk about sports and sports betting! People without a sense of humour need not apply!!
 


       forum.sports-pro.co.uk Forum Index -> Feedback
Sky_Of_Darkness

More over-reaction it seems.

Another touchy topic removed - surprise surprise.


Unless something I missed was posted in the last 5 minutes, I really can't see why it's necessary to remove the JG thread.
Gorg_George

Ah well, can't say the thread'll be missed.
geordie_racer

durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

back to the sound of music

at least it's non-controversial
Sky_Of_Darkness

geordie_racer wrote:
durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

back to the sound of music

at least it's non-controversial


Unless you're against people having large families due to the risk of ovber population.
geordie_racer

Sky_Of_Darkness wrote:
geordie_racer wrote:
durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

back to the sound of music

at least it's non-controversial


Unless you're against people having large families due to the risk of ovber population.


no it's ok 'cos they were fighting the nazis

and were nice singers, brought up properly, and wore curtains
theGoingStick

We've pulled the thread as there were accusations on it that we are unsure about and unsure whether they should be left on the open forum. If you feel that's an over reaction, well you're welcome to hold that view, but we're still going to take a closer look at the thread.

I'll move this to feedback.
Sky_Of_Darkness

geordie_racer wrote:
Sky_Of_Darkness wrote:
geordie_racer wrote:
durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

back to the sound of music

at least it's non-controversial


Unless you're against people having large families due to the risk of ovber population.


no it's ok 'cos they were fighting the nazis

and were nice singers, brought up properly, and wore curtains


Yes, but that's unfair to any Nazi sympathisers.  A lot of people seem to believe that Adolf was almost on the right lines with some of his ideas.
theGoingStick

geordie_racer wrote:
did i miss something here?

a lively debate puntuated by daft goings on over apologies between me and MT

no-one was in the least offended by any post as far as I could see (nor could they reasonably have been) and nothing on the thread was defamatory or insulting

papa was flapping that "it might get heated"

jennie agreed

it didn't


then it was pulled

Im at a loss to see why.... perfectly valid views perfectly validly expressed.

"people without a sense of humour need not apply"

FallonFacta

This forum was set up so as to avoid the sheer nastiness and troublemaking that overtook the BBC. If you think you can post whatever you like on this forum regardless of common sense, the guidelines, the possibility that we might be sued for libel or provocativeness, then you are wrong. It is a private forum with rules that are clear to all, and its main purpose was to try and avoid just the sort of problems that caused the BBC forum to be closed.

We have reviewed the Jade Goody thread.   If you think it's acceptable to call someone, whatever your personal opinion of her, a "media whore", "annoying voice, irrittating personality and screwed up face. Just because she's dying doesn't change that", "famous for getting her kebab out and being a racist", "racist, talentless chav" then maybe this forum isn't for you.

We let this thread run for a lot longer than some recently removed threads mainly due to the negative comments that we get when locking a thread.  We were leniant this time and look where that got us.  Complaints about removing the thread and complaints about not removing it soon enough!

As has been said many times - we are not professional moderators.  We do this is our own time, we use our own opinions and we do this because most of us wanted to be involved in a new forum after the downfall of the BBC.

This forum is three years old this weekend.   Lots of posters and mods have put a lot of work into this place and it is on their behalf that we'd like to say if you don't like this forum and the way it is modded please vote with your mouse and go elsewhere.  There are many other forums available.  BBC's still open, jej's still going, betfair... the list is endless.  

Sorry to be blunt but this has to be said -  And one of the main reasons we are saying it now is because there's a little festival coming up that we don't want ruined by constant arguing.

Thanks for taking the time to read this.  Pleaase think about it.
From the Mods and Admin
MT VESSELS

Can you look back on the thread and see if I beat Geordie in the apology race. I had lined him up to equalise after i had left work and was wondering if he got 2 in before it got pulled.

MT jnr
FallonFacta

MT VESSELS wrote:
Can you look back on the thread and see if I beat Geordie in the apology race. I had lined him up to equalise after i had left work and was wondering if he got 2 in before it got pulled.

MT jnr


Anything to oblige     Quoting Geordie.......
Quote:
sorry, my posting was imprecise and I'm sorry you felt it necessary to apologise

all in all I'm just sorry

AND THE FINAL WHISTLE GOES AS GEORDIE COMPLETES A STUNNING LATE HAT-TRICK

MT OUT OF THE CUP AND THE RACERS REACH THE FINAL

WHO ARE YA, WHO ARE YA, WHO ARE YA

TELL ME MA MEMA I WONT BE OME FOR TEA IM GOING TO WEM BER LEE
TELL ME MA MEMA


He's subtle  
MT VESSELS

He just couldnt let it lie, could he.
Would there be a problem if a thread was started about a hypothetical person called Gade Joody  
Just hate losing to that git, he even says sorry to a PHD level.

MT jnr
value seeker

Bit suprised to find my Jane Goody thread gone when i looked in today at 6.15 pm ,had only seen the first couple of posts and thought it would run for a long time ,mainly cause its a story which will stay on the front pages of  the nationals for a long time as its such a compelling but also tragic story.
Cant comment on pulling its as i never got to read the contents but can see where you are coming from
Sky_Of_Darkness

FallonFacta wrote:

We have reviewed the Jade Goody thread.   If you think it's acceptable to call someone, whatever your personal opinion of her, a "media whore", "annoying voice, irrittating personality and screwed up face. Just because she's dying doesn't change that", "famous for getting her kebab out and being a racist", "racist, talentless chav" then maybe this forum isn't for you.


The problem, as far as I can see, is that the thread was pulled because she is dying and not because of any of the above comments.

There are hundreds of posts on here suggesting people are irritating, or talentless, or have annoying traits - but they were never cross examined, or pulled.  Examples such as comments about the Hills jockeys, Jonathan Ross etc etc.

Comments about people being ugly (screwed up face being one and the same) are also easy to find I'm sure.

Media whore is an expression, which based on her behaviour is fairly accurate, as she has sold pretty much all of her life / privacy to the Media - via a publicist - so why is it an issue?????

Racist - well she did get accused by far higher powers than our Forum, so much so she went to India to apologise, so she must have realised herself that she was offensive with her 'poppodom' or whatever comments they were.

As for the 'kebab' comment, I have to say I don't even understand what it refers to, so won't comment.

As I believe, any of the above comments seem to have been acceptable in general in the past, on a frequent basis.  

On a final note (as it's now bedtime), the below is fact.

Jade Goody has profited off the cancer story already to a tune of over eight million pounds in just a few months since the announcement. She now drives a Bentley Arnage and has six luxury cars in her driveway. She is regularly photographed jetting off to luxury locations and has even found time to open a new beauty salon.

At least her children (who she's doing all this money related stuff for), will have at least 3 luxury cars each.  On the downside, some of the 8 million might be eroded away, due to the cost of keeping the cars rust free and in good working order until the kids are old enough to drive.

Strangely enough, all of the people I knew who had cancer, never really had the energy to go galavanting off round the globe on holiday.
FallonFacta

Apologies for repeating myself ..... "we'd like to say if you don't like this forum and the way it is modded please vote with your mouse and go elsewhere"
alansouthcoast

Jenny asked people on the thread to calm it down, or the thread would get pulled. It didnt calm down so the thread was pulled. Some of you may feel the comments and insults between users were okay. The mods, collectively felt otherwise.

To reiterate FallonFactas point, this Forum was started because many of us didnt like the way the BBC was being moded, or not moded to be exact. The guidelines are clear enough, so hopefully people will stick by them.

Sky makes a good point about why some threads get left and others dont. What happens, as I have explained who knows how often, is the mods have a debate about any content and make a decision on what to do next. I guess we should pull more threads than we do, for libel purposes, yet we try and let as many run as possible. Like FF says, and I hate to say this, no one is forced to use this Forum if they are unhappy with how its run.
Sky_Of_Darkness

Surely we are still allowed to voice our opinion if we disagree, which is all I did last night, to my mind in an articulate and non-offensive manner.

To be answered with "If you don't like it, get lost" is a little over-sensitive in my opinion.

We don't have to agree all of the time do we???

I am satisfied with whatever decisions the mods come up with, but that doesn't mean I don't want to make a comment, and shouldn't be stopped from doing this, as long as I remain within the guidelines.

End of comments from me on this subject.
geordie_racer

MT VESSELS wrote:
He just couldnt let it lie, could he.
Would there be a problem if a thread was started about a hypothetical person called Gade Joody  
Just hate losing to that git, he even says sorry to a PHD level.

MT jnr


can you close this thrad please

calling me a git is not acceptable

jezzareturns

Final comment on this.

I agree with Sky that there are often comments made on many threads that do not get pulled.  Surely that is a good thing as none of us are angels, and expressing opinion is what it is about.

Sky, you were not offended by the comments made, but I was!  Doesn't mean one of us was right, or wrong, differing opinions that is all again.

Jenny asked for it to calm down, I had to go out shortly after and didn't see how things went from then but obviously it hadn't.  I take some responsibility for it getting heated and maybe I should just keep my mouth shut but that's another story.  

My final point is, that the mods do this for nothing and we all benefit hugely from this place, as the beeb was shocking, and still is in it's new format for allowing WUM's and idiots ruining it for most of the others.  I think we should give the mod's a bit of respect here.  I have said it before and sure they make mistakes but at least they own up to it when they do and without them this place would be gone.  It does not mean they are unaccountable, just that giving them a hard time when they are in a difficult position on a legal, let alone moral basis is not fair really.  They don't have to do this!

It must feel to them that we are a bunch of boisterous kids, just waiting to have a fight or pour treacle over Geordie's head (oops did I say that out loud?   ) and they go from one brawl to the next.  We all have a responsibility to post within guidelines, and when things go too far they have no choice but to act.  Fair play to them I say.
alansouthcoast

Jezza has hit the nail on the head. What one person finds offensive, others may not, and vice versa. This is the difficulty Mods have with operating the board. It is also the reason some of you dont like how we do things. That said, we have a better board than 606 or Betfair so we must be doing something right.
westmeadhawk

I haven't been around much because it's half-term.  I wonder what I've missed on the board when I'm away.  I am really saddened to see some of the debate on the now removed thread.

I've been spending time with my kids and that's something Jade and her sons don't have much time left to do, no matter how much money is in the bank.  

Perhaps it's just as well I'm in diluted form this week.
geordie_racer

westmeadhawk wrote:
I haven't been around much because it's half-term.  I wonder what I've missed on the board when I'm away.  I am really saddened to see some of the debate on the now removed thread.

I've been spending time with my kids and that's something Jade and her sons don't have much time left to do, no matter how much money is in the bank.  

Perhaps it's just as well I'm in diluted form this week.


re-starting the debate?
westmeadhawk

No, just catching up with the board.

I don't want to be a school marm type, what I read forces me into a corner.
MT VESSELS

geordie_racer wrote:
westmeadhawk wrote:
I haven't been around much because it's half-term.  I wonder what I've missed on the board when I'm away.  I am really saddened to see some of the debate on the now removed thread.

I've been spending time with my kids and that's something Jade and her sons don't have much time left to do, no matter how much money is in the bank.  

Perhaps it's just as well I'm in diluted form this week.


re-starting the debate?


Sorry Geordie, just dont go there.

MT jnr

geordie_racer

MT VESSELS wrote:
geordie_racer wrote:
westmeadhawk wrote:
I haven't been around much because it's half-term.  I wonder what I've missed on the board when I'm away.  I am really saddened to see some of the debate on the now removed thread.

I've been spending time with my kids and that's something Jade and her sons don't have much time left to do, no matter how much money is in the bank.  

Perhaps it's just as well I'm in diluted form this week.


re-starting the debate?


Sorry Geordie, just dont go there.

MT jnr



once every 26 years they beat us at home

i can live with it

MT VESSELS

If you apologise 4 times, you can have this one




MT jnr
geordie_racer

MT VESSELS wrote:
If you apologise 4 times, you can have this one




MT jnr


we have a song for that one

"four-one, even Chopra scored
four-one, even Chopra scored"

nearest we have got in my adult life to giving the great unwashed the drubbing  they so richly deserve; when we were at our goal-scoring attacking pomp they were skulking in the lower leagues.
Gorg_George

So it's not ok to slag off Jade Goody but it is ok to to criticise my beloved F. Inzaghi? If he had cancer would it be different? Completely hypocritical, I'll be leaving the board with immediate effect.
Machiavellian

Gorg_George wrote:
So it's not ok to slag off Jade Goody but it is ok to to criticise my beloved F. Inzaghi? If he had cancer would it be different? Completely hypocritical, I'll be leaving the board with immediate effect.


Jesus wept
accajacca

Gorg_George wrote:
So it's not ok to slag off Jade Goody but it is ok to to criticise my beloved F. Inzaghi? If he had cancer would it be different? Completely hypocritical, I'll be leaving the board with immediate effect.


stop being a donut  
quizman

You would'nt go on National TV or write a letter
in the paper with your address insulting anyone
or the motivation for their actions.  The reason
this board is such a success is that the Mods do a very
good job helped in a big way by mature
and selective posting.
There is good fun and banter here
but certain subjects are going to
be contentious by nature.
There has to be a code of conduct
at any meeting or club socially
or politically and this is a meeting
of minds online and should be subject
to the same rigours.  To be fair there
is a good degree of leeway given and
I'd hate to think we might descend
to the BEEB bad old days.
Happy 3rd Birthday to all the Mods
and posters.  just an opinion.
jezzareturns

Quizman

I was trying to find the rhymes as thought that was a poem!  Maybe you'd like to do one about "The Mods" ?

Good post Sir, full of common sense.
MT VESSELS

Gorg_George wrote:
So it's not ok to slag off Jade Goody but it is ok to to criticise my beloved F. Inzaghi? If he had cancer would it be different? Completely hypocritical, I'll be leaving the board with immediate effect.


Sounds like a Chelsea directors meeting.

MT jnr
MT VESSELS

jezzareturns wrote:
Quizman

I was trying to find the rhymes as thought that was a poem!  Maybe you'd like to do one about "The Mods" ?

Good post Sir, full of common sense.


You are a philistine jezza.
Poems dont have to rhyme you lezza.
I think off to college you must go.
To learn that this is so.

MT jnr
jezzareturns

Look, just coz Geordie has been whipping your butt no need to take it out on me!  I demand an apology or I'll....I'll....I'll get cross!
Papa 3

jezzareturns wrote:
Look, just coz Geordie has been whipping your butt no need to take it out on me!  I demand an apology or I'll....I'll....I'll get cross!


MTV says would that be cross as in angry? or cross as in dressing, as is your norm, honest, that is what he said, would I lie.?  
jezzareturns

Papa 2 wrote:
jezzareturns wrote:
Look, just coz Geordie has been whipping your butt no need to take it out on me!  I demand an apology or I'll....I'll....I'll get cross!


MTV says would that be cross as in angry? or cross as in dressing, as is your norm, honest, that is what he said, would I lie.?  


He can fantasise if he likes, won't get him anywhere.  
burroughhilllad

Now I know the mods have a tough job etc etc, but they locked the Jade Goody thread but seem to be quite content to leave what a lot of people would consider sick jokes on the joke thread.

I like to think I've got a sense of humour, but there was nothing on that thread as disgusting as the calendar to March "gag", and the ebay "gag".

I'm absolutely repulsed by this as would anyone who has had to deal with this disease first hand.

The Jade Goody thread was lively debate. Those jokes are sick.

Get your priorities right.
theGoingStick

I've pulled the joke thread and the mods will have a look at it's content to see what action needs to be taken.
alansouthcoast

burroughhilllad wrote:


Get your priorities right.


Thanks for the support.
Papa 3

Will the pruned and abridged joke thread be put back?, there were some very funny jokes, not the sick ones, in there, and was always worth a visit now and then.
awaywardlad

Papa 3 wrote:
Will the pruned and abridged joke thread be put back?, there were some very funny jokes, not the sick ones, in there, and was always worth a visit now and then.


Here here
theGoingStick

awaywardlad wrote:
Papa 3 wrote:
Will the pruned and abridged joke thread be put back?, there were some very funny jokes, not the sick ones, in there, and was always worth a visit now and then.


Here here


It's now been put back in off topic ....
Papa 3

Thanks TGS.
burroughhilllad

theGoingStick wrote:
awaywardlad wrote:
Papa 3 wrote:
Will the pruned and abridged joke thread be put back?, there were some very funny jokes, not the sick ones, in there, and was always worth a visit now and then.


Here here


It's now been put back in off topic ....


Thanks.
burroughhilllad

burroughhilllad wrote:
Now I know the mods have a tough job etc etc, but they locked the Jade Goody thread but seem to be quite content to leave what a lot of people would consider sick jokes on the joke thread.

I like to think I've got a sense of humour, but there was nothing on that thread as disgusting as the calendar to March "gag", and the ebay "gag".

I'm absolutely repulsed by this as would anyone who has had to deal with this disease first hand.

The Jade Goody thread was lively debate. Those jokes are sick.

Get your priorities right.


I thought it was fair to say that. The original Jade Goody thread was obviously being monitored and was closed dynamically.

Some of the "jokes" had been on for about 3 days, so presumably you deemed them ok to stay on. They obviously would cause offense to many people so don't understand that decision.

Glad the original thread has been re-instated though cos there is some quality stuff on there.
alansouthcoast

You assume none of us have had to deal with the issue. My father was diagnosed with lung cancer, rather than chose a hospice we decided to keep dad at home. I spent six months nursing him in between ten hour a day shifts. Today is the aniversary of his death. So lets not assume no one else has dealt with with this in real life.

As for the jokes, I did see them, and didnt like them. Thats not unusual for me, I dont find several of the joke topics funny. Do we police whats said and whats not ? If so half of you would be up in arms. If you had simply pm`d a complaint we would have deleted the posts anyway. As it was the jokes have been on the forum for 3 weeks plus and no one has complained.

As for the original jade goody thread, I am suprised you deemed some of the personal comments aimed at her to be okay.
accajacca

hope you get a chance to reflect on some happy memories of your dad today alan.
burroughhilllad

alansouthcoast wrote:
You assume none of us have had to deal with the issue. My father was diagnosed with lung cancer, rather than chose a hospice we decided to keep dad at home. I spent six months nursing him in between ten hour a day shifts. Today is the aniversary of his death. So lets not assume no one else has dealt with with this in real life.

As for the jokes, I did see them, and didnt like them. Thats not unusual for me, I dont find several of the joke topics funny. Do we police whats said and whats not ? If so half of you would be up in arms. If you had simply pm`d a complaint we would have deleted the posts anyway. As it was the jokes have been on the forum for 3 weeks plus and no one has complained.

As for the original jade goody thread, I am suprised you deemed some of the personal comments aimed at her to be okay.


Sorry to hear about this Alan and I won't go on about it anymore just to say I've never assumed no one has been through this, infact I said many people would have been offended.

Just to check, you only consider stuff for censor when a complaint is pm'd to you? If no pm, no censor? I wasn't aware of that.
alansouthcoast

BHL. We censor stuff all the time. We also listen to complaints about posts we may have let go. The problem with jokes is some people dont like jokes about one subject but dont mind about another, and vice versa. It would be impossible for us to please everyone all the time.
burroughhilllad

alansouthcoast wrote:
BHL. We censor stuff all the time. We also listen to complaints about posts we may have let go. The problem with jokes is some people dont like jokes about one subject but dont mind about another, and vice versa. It would be impossible for us to please everyone all the time.


Appreciate that. Perhaps the line in the sand should be any so called jokes about people who have just passed away or whose passing away is imminent.

       forum.sports-pro.co.uk Forum Index -> Feedback
Page 1 of 1
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum