forum.sports-pro.co.uk A discussion forum devoted to people who want to talk about sports and sports betting! People without a sense of humour need not apply!!
Definitely no big deal. But you do get a few 'told you so' forumites every year post Cheltenham who go after the bullish ones. I seem to recall GR being one of those last year too. Shows a lack of class and intelligence imo
Its not my style, personally I would rather it didnt happen, but it is understandable considering some of the pre Cheltenham debate. I am sure we would have had a few "I told you so`s" If kasbah had won. _________________ If at first you dont succeed..then skydiving isnt for you
Definitely no big deal. But you do get a few 'told you so' forumites every year post Cheltenham who go after the bullish ones. I seem to recall GR being one of those last year too. Shows a lack of class and intelligence imo
Its not my style, personally I would rather it didnt happen, but it is understandable considering some of the pre Cheltenham debate. I am sure we would have had a few "I told you so`s" If kasbah had won.
Definitely no big deal. But you do get a few 'told you so' forumites every year post Cheltenham who go after the bullish ones. I seem to recall GR being one of those last year too. Shows a lack of class and intelligence imo
Its not my style, personally I would rather it didnt happen, but it is understandable considering some of the pre Cheltenham debate. I am sure we would have had a few "I told you so`s" If kasbah had won.
I doubt it. But I guess we'll never know now!
thanks Owl
lack of class
lack of intelligence
immature
childish
just for saying before the race that the horse wouldnt win when it didnt
i haven't called anyone on here names for their views, merely suggested that those who clearly thought the horse couldnt be beaten were stupendously wrong
it seems that with some people, when the facts have gone against them, they find it necessary to abuse those who were, as it happens, right all along
ps sorry vicky, i said wouldnt post any more on this topic but when someone needs to resort to name calling for being RIGHT I begin to wonder.... _________________ Geordie_R
"A should of known there mum was buying banana's"
ps sorry vicky, i said wouldnt post any more on this topic but when someone needs to resort to name calling for being RIGHT I begin to wonder....
Don't worry about apologising to me - The last line of your PM confirmed you never bothered to read my posts so I didn't bother taking much notice of your PM _________________ Cocktails may not be the answer.... but they help you forget the question Vodka... Cheaper than B otox and paralyses more muscles!
ps sorry vicky, i said wouldnt post any more on this topic but when someone needs to resort to name calling for being RIGHT I begin to wonder....
Don't worry about apologising to me - The last line of your PM confirmed you never bothered to read my posts so I didn't bother taking much notice of your PM
thaks for that
i'll go and get my handbag too _________________ Geordie_R
"A should of known there mum was buying banana's"
I try and be careful with mine but the temptation to use it can be too much sometimes _________________ Cocktails may not be the answer.... but they help you forget the question Vodka... Cheaper than B otox and paralyses more muscles!
Well, I must admit i topped up on Lethal Weapon bet before the off when i seen the money come, thought McManus knew what he was doing. Obviously not. _________________ 2008 Roll Of Honour (So Far....)
Euro 2008 Tournie Comp Winner
Leopardstown Lucky 15 Competition Runner Up
Jumps Tote Ten To Follow Runner Up
Best Looking Forum Member Winner
The Imsoboreditssunday Game Winner
It seems that being bullish about a horse upsets a few people on this board so in future maybe whenever anyone fanices a horse they should input a disclaimer stating that they know a horse isn't a certainty, might not win, only has a chance etc. Will stop GR and others getting upset
I think its more other people being told they dont know what they are talking about, which upsets them. All of us get bullish about certain horses, all of us get it wrong from time to time. Its no big deal really.
Definitely no big deal. But you do get a few 'told you so' forumites every year post Cheltenham who go after the bullish ones. Shows a lack of class and intelligence imo
I presume you are including me in the 'others' section however I completely disagree with your comments and think you are being a bit childish and possibly still affected by "Kasbah Blues".
My opinion on Starluck is simple. He is a very good horse, proven that Cheltenham is not his track (at the moment) and unproven against top class opposition. I also commented on his break from action not being negative as stated by all connections.
My comments about not being too bullish on the horse at Aintree are backed up with valid points.
Your childish comments about lacking intelligence are starting to annoy a few people and quite frankly IMO have no place on this forum.
Jet.......... _________________ "there is no way anything is going to Katchit"
It seems that being bullish about a horse upsets a few people on this board so in future maybe whenever anyone fanices a horse they should input a disclaimer stating that they know a horse isn't a certainty, might not win, only has a chance etc. Will stop GR and others getting upset
I think its more other people being told they dont know what they are talking about, which upsets them. All of us get bullish about certain horses, all of us get it wrong from time to time. Its no big deal really.
Definitely no big deal. But you do get a few 'told you so' forumites every year post Cheltenham who go after the bullish ones. Shows a lack of class and intelligence imo
I presume you are including me in the 'others' section however I completely disagree with your comments and think you are being a bit childish and possibly still affected by "Kasbah Blues".
My opinion on Starluck is simple. He is a very good horse, proven that Cheltenham is not his track (at the moment) and unproven against top class opposition. I also commented on his break from action not being negative as stated by all connections.
My comments about not being too bullish on the horse at Aintree are backed up with valid points.
Your childish comments about lacking intelligence are starting to annoy a few people and quite frankly IMO have no place on this forum.
Jet..........
I have to say that Starluck traveled like the winner till turning for home & but looked to found out by the hill. He won't be the first too either & he won't be the last.
The fact that he won at Kempton very well seems to tie in with him being a flat track horse & therefore Aintree being the next place to run him.
I wouldn't put anyone off backing him at Aintree, but what price will he be? The whole world will know about his Cheltenham run & the flater track suiting him. _________________ SBH Comp 2008 - Runner Up
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Join! (free) 
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
